Comments on: Cuil vs. Google

By: AIMS Internet Marketing

AIMS Internet Marketing — Thu, 06 May 2010 16:28:44 +0000

Yes it isn’t popular to say the least. I have never seen it show up as a referring site. But it does have a new neat streaming results feature. Do a search for Israel, for example, and you will see that–as well as the time line and category feature on the right.

By: Joan Walker

Joan Walker — Wed, 05 May 2010 15:37:57 +0000

I know it’s a rather old article, but I was searching for Cuil online as I was wondering what’s the scoop with it lately. I guess it sort of died out, huh…

By: Randell Lipke

Randell Lipke — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:34:18 +0000

I love your articles very often because they are written in an understandable style. So I can read them although I come from Germany and have any troubles to translate English stories.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:04:59 +0000

Cuil is definitely going for it, but it’s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google’s done. And even that would take years of effort.

Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It’s in alpha, but I’d be curious to hear your thoughts. http://me.dium.com/search

By: paul savage

paul savage — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:02:06 +0000

nice comparison, as regards to Cuil, I like the design , layout and would probably use it if there wasn’t google. So far on any of my sites CUIL hasn’t registered as any significant traffic (lower than AOL,ASK, etc) so it means SEOs won’t really sit and take notice of it.

I like thing it’s funny that google analytics doesn’t list CUIL.com referrers as search engine referrals !

Paul

By: Chris

Chris — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:34:02 +0000

Great post!thank you