<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil vs. Google</title>
	<link>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randell Lipke</title>
		<link>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Randell Lipke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>I love your articles very often because they are written in an understandable style. So I can read them although I come from Germany and have any troubles to translate English stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your articles very often because they are written in an understandable style. So I can read them although I come from Germany and have any troubles to translate English stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Cuil is definitely going for it, but it's hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google's done. And even that would take years of effort.

Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It's in alpha, but I'd be curious to hear your thoughts. http://me.dium.com/search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuil is definitely going for it, but it&#8217;s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google&#8217;s done. And even that would take years of effort.</p>
<p>Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It&#8217;s in alpha, but I&#8217;d be curious to hear your thoughts. <a href="http://me.dium.com/search" rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul savage</title>
		<link>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>paul savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>nice comparison, as regards to Cuil, I like the design , layout and would probably use it if there wasn't google. So far on any of my sites CUIL hasn't registered as any significant traffic (lower than AOL,ASK, etc) so it means SEOs won't really sit and take notice of it. 

I like thing it's funny that google analytics doesn't list CUIL.com referrers as search engine referrals !

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice comparison, as regards to Cuil, I like the design , layout and would probably use it if there wasn&#8217;t google. So far on any of my sites CUIL hasn&#8217;t registered as any significant traffic (lower than AOL,ASK, etc) so it means SEOs won&#8217;t really sit and take notice of it. </p>
<p>I like thing it&#8217;s funny that google analytics doesn&#8217;t list CUIL.com referrers as search engine referrals !</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aims.co.il/blog/cuil-vs-google/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Great post!thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
